Tuesday, January 27, 2009

"Is This Big Brother or Orwellian"




I urge everyone to go to the link and let me know what you think. I myself can pretty much so agree with this man. I am not of the Christian faith I still relate and agree with his point. I believe also it is important to make ourselves aware and to question the government at hand before it is all at a loss and our Constitution is nothing but a distant memory. Patriotism starts at home and casted with that vote, it is up to us to be responsible with. "Please Check It Out"


Sunday, January 25, 2009

Sunday Rant



Today is Sunday and most days I like to start off reading. Today I am just agitated that President Select Oblah-blah was given this magic carpet ride to the the White house. Once again they used all kind of fear tactics to get their, from they are going to take away Roe v. Wade ( well on the anniversary of Roe v. Wade he did not remove the binding laws to make it easier for clinics in family planing to give advice and support as he was touted that he was going to do. ) The cheery is how they courted Veterans and how they promised that they will be the ones that will give the support to the troops, set things right, give more benefits and over sight. I actually was so proud of Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton who fought so hard before to make things right with are veterans. President Select Oblah-blah could not even excuse himself with the Inauguration. One of the most important Balls of the Inauguration since the conception by President Dwight Eisenhower was the Salute To The Heroes Ball. This ball was conceived to give praise and thanks to those who served, and to honor the highly decorated the medal of honor recipients ( 48 of the 99 living recipients to be exact who came to Washington to honor the President ). Once again those who practice to deceive thought it was not important.

Cleveland Leader


Obama Snubs Nation's Heroes, Becomes the First President to Skip Ball Honoring Medal of Honor Recipients in Over 50 Years
Submitted by Julie on January 21, 2009 - 10:13pm.
Barack Obama may have stumbled over his words briefly during his inauguration, but he made an even bigger blunder later Tuesday evening. The newly sworn-in President
opted not to appear at what should have been one of the most important Balls on his agenda that evening - The Salute to Heroes Inaugural Ball.
The Salute to Heroes Inaugural Ball was begun in 1953 for President Dwight Eisenhower's inauguration. The event recognized recipients of the Medal of Honor, the nation's highest military award. There were 48 Medal of Honor recipients in attendance, who were undoubtedly disappointed by the Commander-in-Chief's failure to show. Over the past 56 years and 14 inaugurations, no President has skipped this event - until now.
The Salute to Heroes Inaugural Ball is sponsored by the American Legion, and co-sponsored by 13 other veteran's service organizations, including those such as the Paralyzed Veterans of America and the Military Order of the Purple Heart.
Instead of attending this ball honoring our nation's heroes, Obama was busy making stops at 10 other official balls. Obama and his wife's first stop was at the Neighborhood Ball. From there they went to the Home State Ball for Illinois and Hawaii, the Commander-in-Chief Ball, the Youth Inaugural Ball, and the Home State Ball for Delaware and Pennsylvania. They finished off the night with brief appearances at the Mid-Atlantic, Western, Midwest, Eastern, and Southern regional Balls.
Celebrities were a plenty at the balls, with Stevie Wonder, Shakira, Mary. J. Blige, Faith Hill, Jay-Z, Alicia Keys, Adam Levine, will.i.am, Sting, Mariah Carey, and Leonardo DiCaprio in attendance at the Neighborhood Ball. In addition, the other nine balls also featured a star-studded lineup including Kanye West and Kid Rock at the Youth Ball, Marc Anthony at the Western Ball, and Cheryl Crow at the Western Ball.
It was the party without all of the celebrities that Obama skipped. The very people who he sought to have support him during his candidacy and campaign, who have fought to protect this country, were snubbed in favor of publicity and the opportunity to rub shoulders - yet again - with the out-of-touch Hollywood elite.





American Legion Acknowledges That Obama Failed to Attend the Salute to Heroes Inaugural Ball

Submitted by Julie on January 25, 2009 - 11:18am.
Barack Obama became the first U.S. president to skip out on the Salute to Heroes Inaugural Ball since its inception in 1953. The event recognizes recipients of the military's highest award - the Medal of Honor - and
as The Cleveland Leader previously reported, over the past 56 years and 14 inaugurations, no President has failed to appear at this event until now. Following the breaking of this news, there have been some misconceptions and erroneous information floating around. The American Legion, one of the main sponsors of the Salute to Heroes Inaugural Ball, issued a statement making it clear once and for all that Barack Obama did not in fact attend the event.
Craig Roberts, Media Relations Manager for the American Legion, issued the following statement:
The American Legion, as it has on every inauguration evening since 1953, hosted the Salute to Heroes Inaugural Banquet & Ball on January 20th. The quadrennial event is co-sponsored with fourteen veterans service and military service organizations and honors recipients of the Medal of Honor. Forty-seven of these heroes attended this year’s event which was held in the Renaissance Washington DC Hotel.
President Obama was invited but did not attend. Vice-President Joe Biden did appear, however, and was very warmly received. The new President’s absence was understandable considering the unprecedented logistical challenges presented by the vastly increased number of visitors to this inauguration and the necessary attendant security measures. The American Legion, as an organization, does not feel offended or “snubbed.”
Obama did make appearances at 10 official balls on January 20, including the Neighborhood Ball, the Home State Ball for Illinois and Hawaii, the Commander-in-Chief Ball, the Youth Inaugural Ball, and the Home State Ball for Delaware and Pennsylvania. He and his wife Michelle finished up the evening with brief appearances at the Mid-Atlantic, Western, Midwest, Easter, and Southern Regional Balls.
The Commander-in-Chief Ball, as some have falsely insinuated, is not the same as the Salute to Heroes Inaugural Ball. The Veteran's Ball, which had been cancelled after the event's organizer disappeared, is also not to be confused with the event honoring Medal of Honor recipients.
The Salute to Heroes Inaugural Ball did take place at the Renaissance Washington DC Hotel on January 20, 2009. 47 Medal of Honor recipients were in attendance at the event. The President traditionally attends, as does the Vice President and other dignitaries. Vice President Joe Biden did attend, but President Obama did not.
Instead, Barack Obama chose to be in the company of Kanye West, Beyonce, Jay-Z, Kid Rock, Stevie Wonder, Mary. J. Blige, Usher, Faith Hill, Alicia Keys, Adam Levine, Shakira, will.i.am, Samuel L. Jackson, Sting, Mariah Carey, Leonardo DiCaprio, Sheryl Crow and Marc Anthony, amongst numerous other celebrities in attendance at the balls he did appear at.
Barack Obama made a monumental mistake in declining to attend the Salute to Heroes Inaugural Ball in favor of rubbing shoulders with celebrities. While the American Legion states that they do not feel snubbed or offended, plenty of America's citizens and servicemen are.



Saturday, January 24, 2009

"Update" Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act Passes Congress

I apologize for being so late but I must put on the blog the success of the Senate who on January 22, 2009 passed the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act.

Sponsor
Sen. Barbara Mikulski [D, MD]




Democrats Voting 'Aye'
Sen. Daniel Akaka [D, HI]Sen. Max Baucus [D, MT]Sen. B. Bayh [D, IN]Sen. Mark Begich [D, AK]Sen. Jeff Bingaman [D, NM]Sen. Barbara Boxer [D, CA]Sen. Sherrod Brown [D, OH]Sen. Robert Byrd [D, WV]Sen. Maria Cantwell [D, WA]Sen. Benjamin Cardin [D, MD]Sen. Thomas Carper [D, DE]Sen. Robert Casey [D, PA]Sen. Kent Conrad [D, ND]Sen. Christopher Dodd [D, CT]Sen. Byron Dorgan [D, ND]Sen. Richard Durbin [D, IL]Sen. Russell Feingold [D, WI]Sen. Dianne Feinstein [D, CA]Sen. Kay Hagan [D, NC]Sen. Thomas Harkin [D, IA]Sen. Daniel Inouye [D, HI]Sen. Tim Johnson [D, SD]Sen. John Kerry [D, MA]Sen. Amy Klobuchar [D, MN]Sen. Herbert Kohl [D, WI]Sen. Mary Landrieu [D, LA]Sen. Frank Lautenberg [D, NJ]Sen. Patrick Leahy [D, VT]Sen. Carl Levin [D, MI]Sen. Blanche Lincoln [D, AR]Sen. Claire McCaskill [D, MO]Sen. Robert Menéndez [D, NJ]Sen. Jeff Merkley [D, OR]Sen. Barbara Mikulski [D, MD]Sen. Patty Murray [D, WA]Sen. Ben Nelson [D, NE]Sen. Bill Nelson [D, FL]Sen. Mark Pryor [D, AR]Sen. John Reed [D, RI]Sen. Harry Reid [D, NV]Sen. John Rockefeller [D, WV]Sen. Charles Schumer [D, NY]Sen. Jeanne Shaheen [D, NH]Sen. Debbie Ann Stabenow [D, MI]Sen. Jon Tester [D, MT]Sen. Mark Udall [D, CO]Sen. Tom Udall [D, NM]Sen. Mark Warner [D, VA]Sen. Jim Webb [D, VA]Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse [D, RI]Sen. Ron Wyden [D, OR]
Republicans Voting 'Aye'
Sen. Susan Collins [R, ME]Sen. Kay Hutchison [R, TX]Sen. Lisa Murkowski [R, AK]Sen. Olympia Snowe [R, ME]Sen. Arlen Specter [R, PA]
Others Voting 'Aye'
Sen. Joseph Lieberman [I, CT]Sen. Bernard Sanders [I, VT]





Republicans Voting 'Nay'
Close
Sen. Lamar Alexander [R, TN]Sen. John Barrasso [R, WY]Sen. Robert Bennett [R, UT]Sen. Christopher Bond [R, MO]Sen. Samuel Brownback [R, KS]Sen. Jim Bunning [R, KY]Sen. Richard Burr [R, NC]Sen. C. Chambliss [R, GA]Sen. Thomas Coburn [R, OK]Sen. Thad Cochran [R, MS]Sen. Bob Corker [R, TN]Sen. John Cornyn [R, TX]Sen. Michael Crapo [R, ID]Sen. Jim DeMint [R, SC]Sen. John Ensign [R, NV]Sen. Michael Enzi [R, WY]Sen. Lindsey Graham [R, SC]Sen. Charles Grassley [R, IA]Sen. Judd Gregg [R, NH]Sen. Orrin Hatch [R, UT]Sen. James Inhofe [R, OK]Sen. John Isakson [R, GA]Sen. Mike Johanns [R, NE]Sen. Jon Kyl [R, AZ]Sen. Richard Lugar [R, IN]Sen. Mel Martinez [R, FL]Sen. John McCain [R, AZ]Sen. Mitch McConnell [R, KY]Sen. James Risch [R, ID]Sen. Pat Roberts [R, KS]Sen. Jefferson Sessions [R, AL]Sen. Richard Shelby [R, AL]Sen. John Thune [R, SD]Sen. David Vitter [R, LA]Sen. George Voinovich [R, OH]Sen. Roger Wicker [R, MS]
Democrats Voting 'Abstain'
Sen. Edward Kennedy [D, MA]


Amendments to S.181
Number
Status
Purpose
S.Amdt.25
Fail
In the nature of a substitute.
S.Amdt.26
Fail
To provide a rule of construction.
S.Amdt.27
Fail
To limit the application of the bill to discriminatory compensation decisions.
S.Amdt.28
Fail
To clarify standing.
S.Amdt.29
Fail
To clarify standing.
S.Amdt.30
Offered
Amendment information not available.
S.Amdt.31
Fail
To preserve and protect the free choice of individual employees to form, join, or assist labor organizations, or to refrain from such activities.
S.Amdt.32
Offered
Amendment information not available.
S.Amdt.33
Offered
Amendment information not available.
S.Amdt.34
Fail
To preserve open competition and Federal Government neutrality towards the labor relations of Federal Government contractors on Federal and federally funded construction projects.
S.Amdt.35
Offered
Amendment information not available.
S.Amdt.36
Offered
Amendment information not available.
S.Amdt.37
Fail
To limit the application of the Act to claims resulting from discriminatory compensation decisions that are adopted on or after the date of enactment of the Act.

Calendar No. 325

110th CONGRESS

1st Session

H. R. 2831

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

August 1, 2007

Received and read the first time

August 2, 2007

Read the second time and placed on the calendar

AN ACT

To amend title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990, and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 to clarify that a discriminatory compensation decision or other practice that is unlawful under such Acts occurs each time compensation is paid pursuant to the discriminatory compensation decision or other practice, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the `Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2007'.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

Congress finds the following:

(1) The Supreme Court in Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., No. 05-1074 (May 29, 2007), significantly impairs statutory protections against discrimination in compensation that Congress established and that have been bedrock principles of American law for decades. The Ledbetter decision undermines those statutory protections by unduly restricting the time period in which victims of discrimination can challenge and recover for discriminatory compensation decisions or other practices, contrary to the intent of Congress.

(2) The limitation imposed by the Court on the filing of discriminatory compensation claims ignores the reality of wage discrimination and is at odds with the robust application of the civil rights laws that Congress intended.

(3) With regard to any charges of discrimination under any law, nothing in this Act is intended to preclude or limit an aggrieved person's right to introduce evidence of unlawful employment practices that have occurred outside the time for filing a charge of discrimination.

(4) This Act is not intended to change current law treatment of when pension distributions are considered paid.

SEC. 3. DISCRIMINATION IN COMPENSATION BECAUSE OF RACE, COLOR, RELIGION, SEX, OR NATIONAL ORIGIN.

Section 706(e) of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000e-5(e)) is amended by adding at the end the following:

(3)(A) For purposes of this section, an unlawful employment practice occurs, with respect to discrimination in compensation in violation of this title, when a discriminatory compensation decision or other practice is adopted, when an individual becomes subject to a discriminatory compensation decision or other practice, or when an individual is affected by application of a discriminatory compensation decision or other practice, including each time wages, benefits, or other compensation is paid, resulting in whole or in part from such a decision or other practice.

(B) In addition to any relief authorized by section 1977a of the Revised Statutes (42 U.S.C. 1981a), liability may accrue and an aggrieved person may obtain relief as provided in subsection (g)(1), including recovery of back pay for up to two years preceding the filing of the charge, where the unlawful employment practices that have occurred during the charge filing period are similar or related to unlawful employment practices with regard to discrimination in compensation that occurred outside the time for filing a charge.'.

SEC. 4. DISCRIMINATION IN COMPENSATION BECAUSE OF AGE.

Section 7(d) of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (29 U.S.C. 626(d)) is amended--

(1) by redesignating paragraphs (1) and (2) as subparagraphs (A) and (B), respectively;

(2) by striking `(d)' and inserting `(d)(1)';

(3) in the third sentence, by striking `Upon' and inserting the following:

(2) Upon'; and

(4) by adding at the end the following:

(3) For purposes of this section, an unlawful practice occurs, with respect to discrimination in compensation in violation of this Act, when a discriminatory compensation decision or other practice is adopted, when a person becomes subject to a discriminatory compensation decision or other practice, or when a person is affected by application of a discriminatory compensation decision or other practice, including each time wages, benefits, or other compensation is paid, resulting in whole or in part from such a decision or other practice.'.

SEC. 5. APPLICATION TO OTHER LAWS.

(a) Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990- The amendment made by section 3 shall apply to claims of discrimination in compensation brought under title I and section 503 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12111 et seq., 12203), pursuant to section 107(a) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 12117(a)), which adopts the powers, remedies, and procedures set forth in section 706 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000e-5).

(b) Rehabilitation Act of 1973- The amendments made by section 3 shall apply to claims of discrimination in compensation brought under sections 501 and 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 791, 794), pursuant to--

(1) sections 501(g) and 504(d) of such Act (29 U.S.C. 791(g), 794(d)), respectively, which adopt the standards applied under title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 for determining whether a violation has occurred in a complaint alleging employment discrimination; and

(2) paragraphs (1) and (2) of section 505(a) of such Act (29 U.S.C. 794a(a)) (as amended by subsection (c)).

(c) Conforming Amendments-

(1) REHABILITATION ACT OF 1973- Section 505(a) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 794a(a)) is amended--

(A) in paragraph (1), by inserting after `(42 U.S.C. 2000e-5 (f) through (k))' the following: `(and the application of section 706(e)(3) (42 U.S.C. 2000e-5(e)(3)) to claims of discrimination in compensation)'; and

(B) in paragraph (2), by inserting after `1964' the following: `(42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq.) (and in subsections (e)(3) of section 706 of such Act (42 U.S.C. 2000e-5), applied to claims of discrimination in compensation)'.

(2) CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964- Section 717 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000e-16) is amended by adding at the end the following:

(f) Section 706(e)(3) shall apply to complaints of discrimination in compensation under this section.'.

(3) AGE DISCRIMINATION ACT OF 1967- Section 15(f) of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (29 U.S.C. 633a(f)) is amended by striking `of section' and inserting `of sections 7(d)(3) and'.

SEC. 6. EFFECTIVE DATE.

This Act, and the amendments made by this Act, take effect as if enacted on May 28, 2007 and apply to all claims of discrimination in compensation under title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000e et seq.), the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (29 U.S.C. 621 et seq.), title I and section 503 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, and sections 501 and 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, that are pending on or after that date.

Passed the House of Representatives July 31, 2007.

Attest:

LORRAINE C. MILLER,

Clerk.

Calendar No. 325

110th CONGRESS

1st Session

H. R. 2831

AN ACT

To amend title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990, and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 to clarify that a discriminatory compensation decision or other practice that is unlawful under such Acts occurs each time compensation is paid pursuant to the discriminatory compensation decision or other practice, and for other purposes.

Thursday, January 22, 2009

Roe v. Wade



January 22, 2009 marks the thirty sixth year anniversary of Roe v. Wade. The powers that be politically wield it like a sword to en-slave the masses. Even though President Bush passed several bills in the house and senate to give swipes at taking down Roe v. Wade it still exist. How long will women and their supporters let these political pundits hold them hostage. I wish people I could educate the general public on the fact it is a difficult process of over turning Roe v. Wade. Not to say it cannot be done?
Powers that be in the political arena said President Bush will end Roe v. Wade and it still exist. When will you stop this madness.
Major Women's group have been used as puppets to use scare tactics to enslave people to tow the line. Frighteningly they have!I say end the oppression shut out groups that use these tactic's like NOW, Ms. Magazine, Women's Law Center, and the like, even the Democratic party. Stand now ( excuse the pun ) write each and everyone of these treasonous, under handed, scare mongers that we will no longer take it.
Liberate yourself !

Ingrid Mattson and the ties Obama has to Muslim Extremist



I would first like to say I am alarmed that the Democratic party has danced around the fact that Ingrid Mattson is under investigation by the United States of America for raising funds and funneling money to the Humas, and the like al-Qaeda, but not only was she there, August in Denver at the gathering of religious leaders, and again at the Inaugural Prayer Service for Obama. Why I ask? Why have they tied themselves to these extremist. I am a proud Democrat and I believe I will stay one but once again I find this alarming with the war on Terrorism has been declared, why would the Democratic party leaders and their selected nominee and president be dancing with suspected terrorist.
Ingrid heads an Islamic Group named by federal prosecutors as a co-conspirator in a terrorism-fundraising in a trial in Texas.


Read more by Front Page Magazine & Campus Watch...



Middle East studies in the News
Department of the Defenseless [incl. Ingrid Mattson]
by Joe KaufmanFrontPage MagazineJanuary 28, 2008
http://frontpagemagazine.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID=AE1AE743-9F2B-448A-BCF4-2D702EC6844C
http://www.campus-watch.org/article/id/4739
Print
Send
RSS
There used to be a time when the greatest threat within the United States government emanated from Arabists in the State Department, Arabists meaning those persons who favor Arab interests and positions in international affairs. Today, a new threat has emerged and from the most unlikely of places, the Department of Defense (DOD), and this time it's not from Arabists but from Islamists, coming from outside the department, looking to infiltrate the most sensitive of areas in our nation.
On September 1, 2006, Deputy Secretary of Defense Gordon R. England was featured as a speaker at the 43rd annual convention of the Islamic Society of North America or ISNA. He began his speech by stating the following:
Friends, fellow Americans, people of faith - Good afternoon! Thank you to Dr. Louay Safi for the kind introduction, and a special thank you to Sheikh Muhammad Nur Abdulla, and Dr. Ingrid Mattson, for your leadership and for the invitation to join you at this Islamic Society of North America conference.
Thank you also for the pleasant lunch, and the opportunity to dialog with the Society's leadership. It was most beneficial to share ideas and values.
It is a profound honor for me to be here with you today, representing all the men and women in the United States military, and all the civilians who serve America in the Department of Defense and throughout the US Government.
ISNA was established by the Muslim Brotherhood (MB)-associated Muslim Students Association (MSA) in 1981, helped into existence by a group of MSA alumni and a teaching assistant at North Carolina State University (NCSU) named Sami Al-Arian, who only two years prior co-founded Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ) in Egypt. ISNA was incorporated using the same physical address as the MSA, which was also the address used to incorporate the American Hamas financing wing, the Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development (HLF).
In December of 2003, ISNA was the subject of a terrorism investigation launched by the U.S. Senate Finance Committee "into possible links between nongovernmental organizations and terrorist financing networks."
In June of 2007, ISNA was named an "unindicted co-conspirator" in a legal case brought by the Justice Department against HLF officials that dealt with the funding of millions of dollars to Hamas. During the trial, a May 1991 MB document bearing ISNA's name was presented as evidence, stating: "The Ikhwan [Brotherhood] must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and ‘sabotaging' its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and G-d's religion is made victorious over all other religions."
Even today, right on ISNA's official website, one can read the following quotes: "May Allah fight the jews and the christians. They took the graves of their Prophets as places of prostration . Two deens [religions] shall not co-exist in the land of the Arabs." And "The Hour will not be established until you fight with the Jews, and the stone behind which a Jew will be hiding will say. ‘O Muslim! There is a Jew hiding behind me, so kill him.'" The statements have been on ISNA's site since March of 2006, months before England gave his speech.
Furthermore, ISNA Executive Council member Muhammad Nur Abdullah (see above) and board members Jamal Badawi, Yusuf Ziya Kavakci, and Muzammil Siddiqi all currently serve as Sharia Scholars for the ‘Fatwa Bank' on Islam Online. Contained in it is a fatwa (religious ruling) mandating violence against American troops, entitled ‘Seeking Martyrdom by Attacking US Military Bases in the Gulf.' It states, "[A]ttacking American soldiers who came to launch war against Muslims is an obligation and Jihad, as they are true invaders. Hence, killing any transgressing American soldier is an obligation and a kind of Jihad since those occupying troops came to invade Muslim lands."
For such a high-ranking government official, as Deputy Secretary England is, to participate in an event sponsored by ISNA is alarming to say the least, but the series of events that followed the speech were far worse and will have much greater implications for the future.
England was named Deputy Secretary in May of 2005. Prior to that, he had held two terms as Secretary of the Navy. Serving on England's staff, while he was with the Navy, was an individual by the name of Hesham Islam. Islam, an Egyptian-born former Naval officer (Retired Commander) and former Merchant Marine for Saddam Hussein's Iraq, while at Naval Postgraduate School, wrote a thesis exhibiting what has been described as anti-Israel and anti-Semitic viewpoints. Islam has since moved on to join Deputy Secretary England's DOD staff as his Special Assistant for International Affairs.
It has been reported that it was Commander Islam that suggested England address ISNA's annual conference. And of course, England going to ISNA was an open invitation for ISNA to return the favor by coming to DOD, which the group took advantage of.
On April 26, 2007, DOD issued a "News Article" about ISNA's visit with the agency the day before. A photo in the release depicts Deputy Secretary England with the President of ISNA Ingrid Mattson and the U.S. Vice President of ISNA Mohamed Hagmagid Ali. It was taken at England's office in the Pentagon.
Also attending the event was the President of the Muslim American Society (MAS) Esam Omeish, who, last September, resigned his government appointed position to the Virginia Commission of Immigration, after a video surfaced showing him advocating violent jihad. Information regarding Omeish's attendance is found on the website of American Muslims for Constructive Engagement (AMCE), an organization created by the International Institute for Islamic Thought (IIIT) to bring radical Muslims closer to the U.S. government. In March of 2002, IIIT's Virginia offices were raided by the FBI in a terror financing probe. In March of 2006, DOD helped pay for an IIIT conference.
Now, it needs to be said that the April photo op and the England speech were not the first times DOD had had dealings with ISNA. In truth, ISNA has been a part of DOD's Muslim chaplaincy program since July of 2002, when it was named as an "endorser of Chaplains." However, not everyone was happy about ISNA's involvement in this program.
In a meeting of the terrorism subcommittee of the Senate Judiciary Committee held in October of 2003, Senators Charles Schumer, Jon Kyl and Dianne Feinstein voiced concern over ISNA's role at DOD. Senator Schumer cited the fact that Siraj Wahhaj, an individual named by the U.S. government as a possible co-conspirator of the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, was at the time a board member of ISNA. Nonetheless, little was done; ISNA kept its position.
Today, thanks to its chief advocate in the government, Hesham Islam, ISNA's role within the Department of Defense is stronger than ever. As has been discussed in depth by such journalists as Bill Gertz, Frank Gaffney and Kenneth Timmerman, this relationship has forced the Islamic law expert for the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Stephen Coughlin, out of his job.
Coughlin, a major in the Army Reserves working as a civilian contractor for the Joint Staff, had recently put together a 333-page document exposing radical Islam's threat to the West, entitled "TO OUR GREAT DETRIMENT": IGNORING WHAT EXTREMISTS SAY ABOUT JIHAD [PDF]. As well, he had raised concerns about the dangerous ties of ISNA and other groups that have been courted by Commander Islam. Coughlin understood what many inside the government do not, that there are mainstream American Muslim organizations that threaten our country from within.
While groups like ISNA and MAS work hard to create a false aura of moderation and modernity, and while they cunningly strive to make inroads in the most sensitive of U.S. government sectors, these same groups hide within their websites declarations of violence aimed at non-Muslims. In reality, they hide their true self. And when individuals, such as Stephen Coughlin, come along, they try to discredit them and remove them from the process. This time, they were successful.
Earlier this month, DOD's Central Command (CENTCOM) canceled a speech that was to be given in front of its personnel by Ahmed Bedier, a leader of the Hamas-related Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR). In doing as such, CENTCOM, the arm of the government responsible for combat operations abroad, exhibited integrity.
It is time for the Defense Department to follow its military offspring and match that integrity by removing ISNA and its friends from its offices. These organizations are threats to our security and have no business taking part in our government, let alone being in our country.
DOD does a great job protecting us, by fighting our enemies abroad. It mustn't forget that those same enemies have counterparts stationed here, as well.
"Ultimately we can never be full citizens of this country… because there is no way we can be fully committed to the institutions and ideologies of this country."
- ISNA board member, Ihsan Bagby, ‘Political Activities of Muslims in America,' 1991
"We are those who have given a pledge of allegiance to Muhammad that we will carry on Jihad as long as we live."
- ISNA official website,‘Fighting in the Cause of Allah (Jihaad),' March 17, 2006 - Present
Joe Kaufman is the Chairman of Americans Against Hate, the founder of CAIR Watch, and the spokesman for Terror-Free Oil Initiative.
Note: Articles listed under "Middle East studies in the News" provide information on current developments concerning Middle East studies on North American campuses. These reports do not necessarily reflect the views of Campus Watch and do not necessarily correspond to Campus Watch's critique.
This article was in the National Review...

September 11, 2008, 2:00 p.m.Meet Ingrid MattsonIslam professor mixes Islamism, academics, and politics.By Jonathan Schanzer
Ingrid Mattson, a 45-year-old Canadian-born convert to Islam, caused an uproar in the blogosphere after she was invited by the Democratic party to a gathering of religious leaders in Denver on the eve of the convention. Other notable participants included Bishop Charles E. Blake, (Church of God In Christ) and Rabbi Tzvi Weinreb (Orthodox Union). The commotion stemmed from the fact that Mattson is the president of the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), an organization with close ties to the Muslim Brotherhood, which was labeled last year by the U.S. Justice Department as an un-indicted co-conspirator in U.S. v. Holy Land Foundation, a Hamas terrorism financing case. Mattson’s overt affiliation with ISNA created only a fleeting political liability in Denver, but she may pose a longer-term danger to the wider American public. Mattson is a professor at the Hartford Seminary, where she teaches Islamic law and Islamic history. Through this position of authority, Mattson has obfuscated the threat of radical Islam, numbing her students and the American public to a dangerous ideology.For example, it is no secret that Wahhabism is a radical Islamist ideology responsible for a great deal of the anti-Western violence produced in the Muslim world. Yet, in a CNN chatroom interview in 2001, Mattson stated that Wahhabism is “a reform movement” that “really was analogous to the European protestant reformation.” Inaccurately, she claimed that “the Saudi scholars who are Wahhabi have denounced terrorism,” despite the fact that many continue to teach its virtues.Islamic-terrorist sleeper cells in the U.S. carried out al-Qaeda attacks on September 11, 2001. Last year, the director of national intelligence explicitly expressed “worry that there are sleeper cells in the U.S.,” and cited specific concerns about increased al-Qaeda capabilities on American soil. Yet, only two months earlier, Mattson insistently told the Baltimore Sun that the supposition that terrorist sleeper cells exist in this country, “is not true. There aren’t any sleeper cells.”Despite the fact that radical Muslims have been responsible for the lion’s share of terrorist attacks against Western interests for decades, Mattson questions why the label “Islamic” is included when President George W. Bush and other leaders talk about terrorism.Unfortunately for her students, Mattson’s teachings appear to be similarly problematic. Whereas policy analysts and intelligence programs focus on the writings of Muslim fundamentalist thinkers, such as Sayyid Qutb and Abul ‘Ala Mawdudi, to learn the dangers of radical Islam, Mattson teaches their writings as examples of “ways in which the Quran functions as sacred scripture in Muslim history and contemporary life.” By way of background, Qutb’s writings inspired many of today’s radical Islamist groups, including al Qaeda, while Mawdudi inspired other Islamist leaders, such as Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, the father of the Islamic Republic of Iran.Mattson’s apologia may seem egregious, but it is fairly standard stuff in her profession. Americans have become increasingly aware of the way in which professors of Middle Eastern studies whitewash the dangers of radical Islam.What might be more surprising is the extent to which Mattson publicly and proudly associates with a notoriously Islamist cause like ISNA. This makes it more difficult for her to portray her Islamist leanings as “scholarship.” As Mattson wrote in a book she published in 2002, “People of faith have a certain kind of solidarity with others of their faith community that transcends the basic rights and duties of citizenship.” In other words, Mattson implies that the Muslim identity transcends the American identity.In the same book, she also questions the very character of America. “There is no guarantee,” she writes, “that Americans will rise to the challenge of defining themselves as an ethical nation.”It is this cynical approach to America, along with her Islamist ideals and associations, that made Mattson a political liability in Denver.Sadly, she is just one example of the way in which Islamism has penetrated American universities, and even U.S. politics. — Jonathan Schanzer, an adjunct scholar at http://www.campus-watch.org/, is director of policy for the Jewish Policy Center, and author of the forthcoming book Hamas vs. Fatah: The Struggle for Palestine.

Monday, January 19, 2009

"Call To Action"





On the eve of the Inauguration of Barack Hussein Obama. I urge every woman and supporter to put a sign in the window very simple "ERA".
Pass this on and encourage all to do, we need this sign in windows and yards across the nation, till it passes.
Sincerely Ms. Je'Amour P. Matthews ( Betty, Red Truck )
D.I.S







Sunday, January 18, 2009

Obama Train












“Ok” let me understand this Obama is taking a train from Philadelphia to Washington D.C. Tracing the famous trip of Abraham Lincoln.
First Abraham Lincoln was Republican!
Second the Emancipation Proclamation did not free all the slave it was the ratification of the Thirteenth Amendment on December 18, 1865, which was not Lincoln!
Now what would that have to do with Obama?
Or is he going on freedom of African Americans?
Unless Obama mother's family somehow had slaves in it, and is Highest Yellow Blacks I ever seen?
Cause we all know his father was not African American he was Arabic and Kenyan. So this proves to be another farce.
Now the other thing that should be rubbing Americans the wrong way is the cost of this Inauguration one hundred sixty million is the estimated cost, to quote Carole Florman, a spokeswoman for the joint congressional committee on inaugural ceremonies, told the New York Daily News. President Clinton's and President Bush all eight Inaugurations do not equal one egotist Obama. Democrats screamed foul at President Bush 2004 cost of his Inauguration which cost forty two million. This economy is in the toilet and the Democratic held Senate and Congress are just pleased as punch. “Not”a word other than this is historic. People are losing their homes, jobs, medical benefits at a alarming rate, and signing up for food stamps like never before.
Now to think one hundred sixty million is cool. I guess this goes along with all of the pork spending, and bailouts with no oversight. Guess what people Obama plans more.He rode the train alright, right through your pockets and he has not even taken the oath of office.
One last thing have you heard his speech's about how he is going to bring back the United States to an open government. Why not start with his complete medical records, school records and his birth certificate.

Thursday, January 15, 2009

Inauguration of the King








Inauguration of the King; President Select Barack Hussein Obama Inauguration is costing to date one hundred ten million; Carole Florman, spokeswoman for the joint congressional committee on inaugural ceremonies, told the New York Daily News, which estimated the cost at one hundred sixty million. President George Bush inauguration cost tax payers forty two million in 2005. President William Jefferson Clinton inauguration was thirty three million in 1993. Why in the economic strife of the country would we be spending this kind of money. I like to also point out the six hundred twenty one million dollars spent on the Capital Visitor Center, this was the shinning star of the United States, welcoming visitors to Washington D.C. and an introduction to the Capital complex. This shinning star which opened in December 2, 2008. The original cost was two hundred sixty five million was to be complete four years ago, but nine eleven caused them to re think the security measure. Well they did not think to well because it is a security risk to open it during the inauguration. Go Figure? Another fine blunder of our representation in Washington D.C. if this does not make you want to ousted every one of these fat cats then you do not belong to the human race. The joke that was heard around the world of our visitor center was America's Taj Ma Hal, we need this visitor center but the cost has shown foolish, now that it is worthless during an inauguration. Not even President Franklin Delano Roosevelt who took office in 1933 spent the kind of money that this congress is spending. The President knew the times and the strife the country was in during the depression. President Select Obama has not even taken office and is proposing corporate welfare bail out, loaded with pork. This does not address the needs of the nation it is only lining the pockets that forged his way to Public Office. I love that Public Office, we have a nation of ill informed half wits who have no clue what is going on, and blindly follow these fools like god's from above. Nope no cling to guns and religion, but to the principal some how these demi-gods care and will deliver us from the woe of common day drudgery. So quickly to believe what will spill out of their mouths as fact. To blindly believe what ever dribble this group or that group pro ports to be. They finely tuned the fork to deliver with each blow of holding things over your head as a matter of fact. "Oh" star's don't vote for that one they banned books. Lie! Don't vote for that one they will take away your right to choose. Lie! Don't vote for that one they are a war monger. Lie! The American blindly grumble back to their slumbers oblivious to what is real, true, or fact. America is failing and faltering at the hands of the people who do not read and become informed. Americans should make the government afraid of them, but in these times it is the other way around. Safely they nibble at taking your rights away with such acts as the Patriot Act, FISA, and the like. Boldly ignoring the laws and principles of the Constitution of the United States. Eventually it will fail and be re written. Americans will blindly go along with it with out care or conviction. If it does not interferer with their Desperate Housewives or CSI, how does it effect them. Wake up America! Wake up before it is to late...
Spread this message far and wide contact your congressional leaders let them know what you think of these cost, and this propose bail out. "Do It" before it is to late because the clock is ticking down not much time is left for us ...
Take the time to listen what a great leader sounds like...

Tuesday, January 13, 2009

Remeber Remeber The Fourth Of November




The Gun Powder, Treason, & Plot...

If you the American people do not believe that this candidate was systematically installed as the President of the United States then you are very sadly mistaken. I believe this to be going on far longer than you think. Do you believe that elections in this country have been accurate, fair and impartial, then you are sadly wrong. We witnessed the first of these assaults first hand with the installed President George Bush, his administration including the Judicial and Congress have undermined the Constitution more than most know. The Presidency has garnished more power than allowed, and the Patriot Act implemented by the House and Senate have created the great divide in our government. Even the Supreme Court of the land have not stepped in. The suppose defenders of our Constitution. People have humbly sat and watch and grumble through it all. Only when we stand up and scream foul will we see a change. Only when we demand that things be counted accurately and fairly will it change. Only when we as a nation demand that our Representatives stand true to the Constitution of the land or be ousted. It is now or never! 202.7 million eligible voters in this country, this last election roughly 123 million voted. This is a travesty when you realize more people vote for the American Idol than a Representative of their Government. You heard Obama got the highest amount of African Americans voting for him in a Presidential election. Lie! Albert Gore got more in 2000. We were told Obama increased his lead with the youth vote, and registered more than any other in history. Lie! He had slightly more than one percent more than the last Presidential election. Now to get back to the fraud and deception. Many Caucus States don't even require any form of ID to Caucus. States like Iowa showed more people Caucusing than were eligible in a precinct, Texas alone had over two thousand lawsuits over fraud. Another prime example of fraud is when there is no accountability of the election machines we use. Precinct showing more votes than people voted. Right now in Minnesota with the recount of the Senate seat of Senator Coleman, Al Frakkan got a lead of 225 votes, but once again it is showing more votes than people have voted in some precincts. I am not a fan of Norm Coleman, but when are people going to get angry and scream foul. Obama did raise more campaign funds than any other, but they are not even auditing his small donor list, even after question has risen about the origins where the money came from. This is why he did not take the campaign matching funds from the government because it automatically requires you to report where the funds come from, it automatically audits your campaign funds. You would think that the Federal Election Commission would have question his small donor list because of this, it has not. I believe when the powers that be can control the helm of any country and be able to have election come out in their favor, and the Constitution of the United States is less than law. Then We The People got problems.
You would think when something as simple as questioning the fact of the eligibility of candidate, that the Stewards of our great nation would step up to safe guard and show prof of such eligibility. "They Have Not"; those who stood up to the plate have been lambasted as radicals, conspiracy theorist, un patriotic, when it is the simple patriotic thing to do? By our Constitution and laws that govern our land is to question and get answers. That is why we have set up an open government made of laws such as the Sunshine Law.
The sad thing is most people have not a clue what our Constitution states, or the core principals. When I hear young Americans who do not know who Alice Paul is, our schools failed, and our government failed to teach them. Once again No Child Left Behind is essentially, it fails our youth of a proper education. What we do not know about our past we are doomed to repeat it.
I like to remind you in most countries that end in dictatorship, is a country that have taken the rights away of their citizens."We"are losing our rights everyday, and the powers that be have now successfully corrupted the election system like never before.
What Can We Do You Ask?
Start by demanding the Federal Election Commission audit Obama small donor list. Write or phone them, starting here Brian Duffy Chief Financial Officer, 999 E Street, Washington D.C. 20463, 1 800 424-9530 press 0 then ext. 1315, or 202 694-1315, Thomasenia P. Duncan General Counsel 1 800 424-9530 press 0 then ext. 1650, or 202 694-1650.
As for Obama eligibility you can contact the Supreme Court...
Send a copy to each Justice in a signed sealed envelope, place in a Fed Ex or Priority Mail. Addressed to...
Public Information Officer, Supreme Court of the United States, Washington, DC 20543.
Chief Justice John Roberts
Associate Justices
John Paul Stevens
Antonin Scalia
Anthony Kennedy
David Souter
Clarence Thomas
Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Stephen Breyer
Samuel Alito
You can even print this out sign and send it...
Petition for Point of order: Barack H. Obama II is not qualified to become president.Posted on January 6th, 2009 by David Crockett Please send to senators and representatives.Send it as registered mail and e-mail it as wellGrievance: Barry Soetoro/a.k.a. Barack Hussein Obama II is not qualified to become president, having had primary allegiances to other nations, and not providing unambiguous evidence he is a "natural born Citizen" without other allegiance, to satisfy the Constitution Article 2 Sect. 1.Prayer: By your oath to uphold the Constitution, your privilege to raise a Point of Order, by the 10th Amendment powers retained by We the People, and by the right of petition for redress of grievances, I pray that you cosign/raise an Objection/Point of Order in Congress on January 8th 2009, with a member of the other House, on the reading of each State's electoral certificates/of the total vote for Barack Hussein Obama II, per 3 U.S.C. Ch. 1, §15, §17, §19(a) (1), and §19 (c) (1), namely:"We/I Object/raise a Point of Order that Mr. Barack Hussein Obama II, is not qualified to become president per the Constitution Article Two, §1, having "Foreign Allegiances" by birth and adoption, by renouncing US citizenship, and by failing to provide unambiguous evidence that he is "a natural born Citizen" without other allegiance, election of a President who does qualify having precedence over other business of this House per Amend. 20 §3 and 3 USC 1. In particular:1 Mr. Obama having had conflicting "Foreign Allegiance"(s) cannot become Commander in Chief having sole allegiance to the USA, and thus cannot qualify as "a natural born Citizen".1.1 Barry Soetoro, a.k.a. Barak Obama, has first allegiance to Indonesia, having Indonesian citizenship with renunciation of US citizenship, by adoption/legal acknowledgment by Lolo Soetoro Mangunharjo, a citizen of Indonesia, per Constitution of Indonesia, Law No. 62 of 1958, Art. 2 (1), as required to enroll in Indonesian schools, per school records and travel to Pakistan in 1981; and1.2 Mr. Obama had first allegiance to the British Crown and to Kenya, being born a citizen of Kenya through his Kenyan birth father Barack Obama, Sr., per Chapter VI. Sections 87 and 97 of the Constitution of Kenya; and being a bipatride under the U.K. Nationality Act of 1948.2. Mr. Obama failed to produce unambiguous evidence that he is a "natural born Citizen" born to US citizens "in the allegiance of the United States" and he retained that exclusive allegiance.2.1 Mr. Obama has failed to exhibit unambiguous original evidence that A) he was born to two US citizens "in the allegiance of the United States", while meeting statutory citizenship requirements, and that B) he retained exclusive allegiance to the United States, including his original vault-version birth certificate and all other legal birth certificate versions and passports; and2.2 Mr. Obama's Kenyan paternal step grandmother Sarah Hussein Obama states that she was present at his birth in (Mombosa) Kenya, per Affidavits of Bishop Ron McRae and of Rev. Kweli Shuhubia in Philip J. Berg v. Barack Hussein Obama et al. Fed. Cir. D.PA. Civil No: 08-cv-04083."Signature:_______________________________________________Name:__________________________________________________Address:_____________________________________________________________________________City__________________County: __________________State:____ ZipCode______________

Most Important; it is up to each and everyone of us to vote and demand that we need election reform, end the use of the election machines with no accountability. Write your Representative from State to Federal demanding reform. It is up to us to hold them accountable or getting them out of office. If our country faulters or fails it is because as citzens we did not do all we can do to defend her...
Sincerely Je'Amour P. Matthews

"Once Last Thing"
It is urgent you contact your Senator's and ask them to support the Lily Ledbetter Fair Pay Act...

Sunday, January 11, 2009

Happy Birthday Alice Paul

Happy Birthday Alice Paul!





January 11, 1985 - July 9, 1977
Why should this not be a holiday? I urge each and every one of you to write your Senator & Congressman to make this a national holiday...
Alice Paul needs to be recognize, do you realize most young people of today do not know who she is. Has NOW or any other women's organization seen to that. "NO"
This is a time to honor Ms. Paul. I respect her when she started her own party National Woman's Party.
NASWA ( National American Suffrage Women Suffrage Association) drop the ball just like NOW , they became out of touch and ineffective. Alice knew if she stuck with them she would have never achieved the goal of the right for women to vote. As Alice Paul so should we send a message to all these women's organizations the message; you dropped the ball and are out of touch. NOW, Ms Magazine, several others all jumped on the Obama camp, this man slung more sexist attacks at Hillary Rodham Clinton, and Governor Sarah Palin, like a prize fighter. Hence forth I believe we need to send these organization old undergarments let them know they have lost touch and they serve no purpose like the old undergarments. Look did you see these organizations step up with the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act. No you did not. They receive millions of dollars a year in donations, have you seen a promotion to get people involved or to inform the women of America about this legislation, no they have not. All I got was a general email from NOW that was it. As for NOW they made countless mistakes there is one that really has bothered me so? Every year they have a shindig in DC, this year they honored Hillary Rodham Clinton on her bid for President, at any time did they address the sexist attacks from the media to the candidate they endorsed "Obama" ( Before the convention they change from Hillary to him ). Sadly at this time of the shindig Seneca Falls celebrated 160 year Women's Rights first convention and all it got was an honorable mention."Let's" honor Alice Paul on her "Birthday" by getting active, send this message to everyone you know...




Let's start with Ms. Magazine with there Obama as the Super Feminist send your letter and undergarments to this worn torn out of touch rag...

Queries/ Ms . magazine433 South Beverly Drive Beverly Hills , CA 90212









This is more like the truth!
Next Write NOW...



"NOW"I thought for day's what would be the correct action against The National Organization of Women. I mean come on they lost focus, they endorsed a man for president who does not give his Senate staff equal pay for equal work. In the primary season they did not seem to be to bent out of shape over all the rampant sexism the media directed at the female candidate, and the candidate they endorsed dished out the sexist banter also. I finally think I know what we need to do.Write this to them Dear National Organization of Women you are old out of touch, and worn torn like this old bra, out shape thread bare, and no longer serve a purpose. Since this is what you seem to represent to America "We Want You To Have This Bra", as a symbol of your uselessness, burn it like the old days because you seem to not have the fight in you. You have endorsed a candidate who does not give equal pay for equal work ( Fact ), and you never launched a national campaign against this candidate when he served up volley after volley of misogyny (Fact). As a matter of fact you dropped the ball of a national campaign against the media for the same. Now (no pun intended) with the celebration in July of Seneca Falls your little shindig in Washington only gave an honorable mention of the fact, it should had been the driving force (160 years of the women's rights movement). You got to big for your fancy putting on airs pant suit. I think it is time for the real Suffragettes & Men of Honor to take over...Sign your name and send them that old bra, you know the one that you a cannot part with like old friend you patched it maybe got a few safety pins in it, would die if someone actually seen it...(Guys You Just Let Them Know This Bra Is My Wife, or Girlfriend & She Wanted Me To Let You Know)and send it to:NOW Foundation P.O. Box 1848Merrifield, VA 22116-8048
Last but not least let us focus on the Supreme Court, over 80 thousand people have ask the Supreme Court to hear these cases. To defend the Constitution...

Send a letter to the Supreme Court ask them to uphold the Constitution of the land, that Obama birth records must be reviewed...
Send a copy to each Justice in a signed sealed envelope, place in a Fed Ex or Priority Mail. Addressed to...

Public Information Officer, Supreme Court of the United States, Washington, DC 20543.
Chief JusticeJohn Roberts
You can even ptint this out sign and send it...

Petition for Point of order: Barack H. Obama II is not qualified to become president.Posted on January 6th, 2009 by David Crockett Please send to senators and representatives.Send it as registered mail and e-mail it as wellGrievance: Barry Soetoro/a.k.a. Barack Hussein Obama II is not qualified to become president, having had primary allegiances to other nations, and not providing unambiguous evidence he is a "natural born Citizen" without other allegiance, to satisfy the Constitution Article 2 Sect. 1.Prayer: By your oath to uphold the Constitution, your privilege to raise a Point of Order, by the 10th Amendment powers retained by We the People, and by the right of petition for redress of grievances, I pray that you cosign/raise an Objection/Point of Order in Congress on January 8th 2009, with a member of the other House, on the reading of each State's electoral certificates/of the total vote for Barack Hussein Obama II, per 3 U.S.C. Ch. 1, §15, §17, §19(a) (1), and §19 (c) (1), namely:"We/I Object/raise a Point of Order that Mr. Barack Hussein Obama II, is not qualified to become president per the Constitution Article Two, §1, having "Foreign Allegiances" by birth and adoption, by renouncing US citizenship, and by failing to provide unambiguous evidence that he is "a natural born Citizen" without other allegiance, election of a President who does qualify having precedence over other business of this House per Amend. 20 §3 and 3 USC 1. In particular:1 Mr. Obama having had conflicting "Foreign Allegiance"(s) cannot become Commander in Chief having sole allegiance to the USA, and thus cannot qualify as "a natural born Citizen".1.1 Barry Soetoro, a.k.a. Barak Obama, has first allegiance to Indonesia, having Indonesian citizenship with renunciation of US citizenship, by adoption/legal acknowledgment by Lolo Soetoro Mangunharjo, a citizen of Indonesia, per Constitution of Indonesia, Law No. 62 of 1958, Art. 2 (1), as required to enroll in Indonesian schools, per school records and travel to Pakistan in 1981; and1.2 Mr. Obama had first allegiance to the British Crown and to Kenya, being born a citizen of Kenya through his Kenyan birth father Barack Obama, Sr., per Chapter VI. Sections 87 and 97 of the Constitution of Kenya; and being a bipatride under the U.K. Nationality Act of 1948.2. Mr. Obama failed to produce unambiguous evidence that he is a "natural born Citizen" born to US citizens "in the allegiance of the United States" and he retained that exclusive allegiance.2.1 Mr. Obama has failed to exhibit unambiguous original evidence that A) he was born to two US citizens "in the allegiance of the United States", while meeting statutory citizenship requirements, and that B) he retained exclusive allegiance to the United States, including his original vault-version birth certificate and all other legal birth certificate versions and passports; and2.2 Mr. Obama's Kenyan paternal step grandmother Sarah Hussein Obama states that she was present at his birth in (Mombosa) Kenya, per Affidavits of Bishop Ron McRae and of Rev. Kweli Shuhubia in Philip J. Berg v. Barack Hussein Obama et al. Fed. Cir. D.PA. Civil No: 08-cv-04083."Signature:_______________________________________________Name:__________________________________________________Address:_____________________________________________________________________________City__________________County: __________________State:____ ZipCode______________
"Pass This On Please"