Saturday, October 25, 2008


This is a crime, a travesty. This is a coupe and a take over of our country. I am asking Americans to stand up and demand that this be taken serious. Instead of political pandering. I am asking Americans to take this to the streets. The judge who dismissed this is a President Clinton apointee, a friend of Governor Rendel. I believe if eight states can file cases about the birth certificate, then this is a case that must be heard. I must remind people that when you fail to comply it is consider an admission of guilt. So why would a judge dimiss if there is a admission? I say we need to make every attempt to write letters, emails, call our Attorney General, Election Commission, Senator Arlen Specter 412-644-3400 , Judge Fitspatrick 202-863-8500. If as Americans if we sit back and watch I believe we will lose what is left of our country...
Tom Corbett Attorney General Pensylvania
By Phone:717-787-3391
By Fax:717-787-8242
to email you have to go to the site
Election Commision PA
State Contact Information:210 North Office BuildingHarrisburg, PA 17120(717) 787-5280 FAX (717) 705-0721Voter Hotline: 1-877-VOTESPA

Philip J. Berg is Appealing to the U.S. Supreme Court as Obama is "NOT" qualified to be President of the United States Lawsuit Against Obama Dismissed from Philadelphia Federal Court
For Immediate Release: - 10/25/08 - Contact Info at end.
UPDATE: Ruling attached at end. It's a really poor copy, but it is all we have for the moment. Willl put up a better copy when we get one.
(Lafayette Hill, Pennsylvania – 10/25/08) - Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama challenging Senator Obama’s lack of “qualifications” to serve as President of the United States, announced today that he is immediately appealing the dismissal of his case to the United States Supreme Court. The case is Berg v. Obama, No. 08-cv-04083.Berg said, "I am totally disappointed by Judge Surrick's decision and, for all citizens of the United States, I am immediately appealing to the U.S. Supreme Court.This is a question of who has standing to uphold our Constitution. If I don't have standing, if you don't have standing, if your neighbor doesn't have standing to question the eligibility of an individual to be President of the United States - the Commander-in-Chief, the most powerful person in the world - then who does?So, anyone can just claim to be eligible for congress or the presidency without having their legal status, age or citizenship questioned.
According to Judge Surrick, we the people have no right to police the eligibility requirements under the U.S. Constitution.What happened to ‘...Government of the people, by the people, for the people,...’ Abraham Lincoln in his Gettysburg Address 1863.We must legally prevent Obama, the unqualified candidate, from taking the Office of the Presidency of the United States,” Berg said.Our website now has 71.8 + million hits. We are urging all to spread the word of our website – and forward to your local newspapers and radio and TV stations.Berg again stressed his position regarding the urgency of this case as, “we” the people, are heading to a “Constitutional Crisis” if this case is not resolved forthwith. * * For copies of all Court Pleadings, go to
# # #
Philip J. Berg, Esquire555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531Cell (610) 662-3005(610) 825-3134(800) 993-PHIL [7445]Fax (610) 834-7659
' );

1 comment:

Ted said...

Handled right, the Fed District Court throwing out Berg for lack of standing can present a political check-mate “win” on appeal for the anti-Obama side (if not in law, in the Court of Public Opinion). Here’s how: SIMPLY SPREAD AROUND OBAMA’S APPELLATE BRIEF HAVING TO ARGUE AGAINST AN AMERICAN VOTER’S RIGHT TO RAISE THE QUESTION UNDER THE CONSTITUTION. Should be a PR disaster for the Dems and Obama!!!